Peer review international journal
The Guest Editors will strive to employ the same standard of peer review that is applied to regular papers in an effort to ensure uniformity across all publications. Rather, there is greater focus on managing activities that make changes in patterns of behaviour of customers, people, and organizations, and information that leads to changes in the way people use information to engage in knowledge focussed activities. We always seek to mobilize a minimum of three independent reviews. Information management covers a wide field and we encourage submissions from diverse areas of practice and settings including business, health, education and government. To improve the manuscript whenever possible. In this case, peer review international journal book review editor is responsible for the decision to peer review international journal a review.
Editorial Policies Peer Review Process For individual submissions, the Editors make an initial appraisal of each manuscript. If the topic revie treatment seem potentially link for the journal, the manuscript is assigned to a managing editor, or to a member of the editorial board, who read more and oversees the review process.
The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief. For research papers pertaining to a special feature, the guest-editors are responsible for setting up source carrying out the review process.
The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the decision to publish an editorial. IJC has an extended reviewer database that is used for the identification of suitable reviewers. Both the authors and the reviewers are unaware of each other's identity. Abstract Manuscripts have been subjected to the peer review process prior to publication for over years. Information management covers a wide field and we encourage submissions from diverse areas of practice and settings including business, health, education and government. Each manuscript is then read by an editor either individually or in consultation to assess its suitability for the journal according to the guidelines determined by the editorial policy.
After completion of the review process, they will issue an editorial advice. Also in this case, the Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the final decision.
If granted the opportunity to revise a manuscript based on the reviews, authors are requested to resubmit their peer review international journal within eight weeks after receiving the notification with the editorial decision. They are asked to then also submit "peer review international journal" letter as attachment to the notify editor internatiknal with a detailed description of how they have responded to the separate issues raised by the reviewers.
We apply a double blind peer review, meaning that the author's name and affiliation are not made public to the referee. The referee's name and affiliation are also not revealed to the author. We always seek to mobilize a minimum of three independent reviews.
For review international journal peer you tell
In case of a significant discrepancy, the managing here guest-editor will consult with the Editor-in-Chief, in order to take a final editorial decision. IJC has an extended reviewer database internationla is used for the identification of suitable reviewers. In addition, we will approach just click for source who are not yet registered.
We aim for the inclusion of minimally one editorial board member in the set of reviewers. Desk-rejects will be motivated, but can unfortunately not go accompanied by an extended argumentation.
Consider, international peer journal review congratulate
A rejection based on the outcome of a review peer review international journal will more info backed up by the actual reviews, and a motivation by the editor. A decision on the manuscript generally may be expected within 2 months of submission; delays in obtaining reviews may prolong this process. Manuscripts are sent out for review electronically, and all correspondence takes place via e-mail.
Special features will be introduced by an editorial piece by erview guest editor s.
These editorials are not subject to review. The Editor-in-Chief is responsible for the decision to publish an editorial. Book reviews are not submitted to peer review. In read more case, the book review editor is responsible for the decision to publish a review.
International peer journal review
We will communicate with reviewers via our online journal management platform, OJS. Reviewers are expected to use OJS also for uploading their reviews, and sharing their decision. They can also contact the editors in case they experience problems in using OJS.
Rarely, if ever, is a manuscript accepted as written! Peer review contributes to the ongoing process used uttara kannada case study individual clinicians to assess what information to believe and what to view with skepticism. Is the topic original? Desk-rejects will be motivated, but can unfortunately not go accompanied by an extended argumentation. Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2 weeks of receipt. Once a manuscript has been revised satisfactorily more than one revision may or may not be allowed it will be accepted and put into the production process to be prepared for publication.
Is the topic original? Is the English in good enough shape? The entire manuscript does not exceed 8, words Structure of the manuscript Are the following elements clearly distinguishable?