How to write a conclusion of a book review
Book Reviews What this handout is about This handout will help you write a book review, a report or essay that offers a critical perspective see more a text.
It offers a off and suggests some strategies for writing book reviews. What is a review? Article source review is a critical evaluation of a text, event, object, or phenomenon. Reviews can consider read more, articles, entire genres or fields of literature, architecture, art, fashion, restaurants, policies, exhibitions, performances, and many other forms.
This handout will focus on book reviews.
Counterintuitively, it is actually best to begin by explaining how to get reviews published. What is a review? There are some common features in structuring the final part of an essay. You may not be or feel like an expert, but you need to pretend to be one for your particular audience.
For a similar assignment, vook our handout on literature reviews. Above all, a review makes an argument. The most important element of a review is that it is a commentary, not merely a summary. You can offer agreement or disagreement and read article where you find the work exemplary or deficient in its knowledge, judgments, or organization.
- Sum up the main aspects of your work.
- Phoenix, AZ: Oryx Press,
- Were this sort of attitude replicated across the whole of the academy, intellectual life would, in my view, become more impoverished as a consequence.
You should clearly state your opinion of the work jow question, and that statement will probably resemble other types of academic writing, with a thesis statement, supporting body paragraphs, and a conclusion. See our handout on argument. Typically, reviews are brief.
Really. And write review a book a to of conclusion how consider
In newspapers and academic journals, they rarely exceed words, although you may encounter lengthier assignments and extended commentaries. In either case, reviews need to be succinct. While they vary in tone, subject, and style, they share some common features: First, a review gives the reader a concise summary of the content. This includes a relevant description of the topic as well as its overall perspective, argument, or purpose.
Second, and more importantly, a review offers a critical assessment of the content. This involves your reactions to the work under review: what strikes you as noteworthy, whether or not it was effective or persuasive, and how it enhanced your understanding of the issues at hand. Becoming regiew expert reviewer: three short examples Reviewing can be a daunting task. Reveiw point is that someone—a professor, a journal editor, peers in a study group—wants to know what you think about a particular work.
You may not be or feel like an expert, but you need to pretend to be one for your particular audience. Historically, ale and beer not milk, wine, or water were important elements of the English diet. The student describes the subject of the book and provides an accurate summary of its contents. As a critical assessment, conclusioj book review should focus on opinions, not facts and details.
Summary should be kept to a minimum, and specific details should serve to illustrate arguments. I wanted to know about the rituals surrounding drinking in medieval England: the songs, the games, the parties. Bennett wtite none of that information. I liked how the book showed ale and beer brewing as an economic activity, but the reader gets lost in the details of prices and wages.
I was more interested in the private lives of the women brewsters.
The reader has a sense of what the student expected of the book, but no sense of what the author herself set out click the following article prove.
Although the student gives several reasons for the negative review, those examples do not clearly relate to each other as part of an overall evaluation—in other words, in support of a specific thesis. This review is indeed an assessment, but not a critical one. It combines balanced opinion and concrete example, a click the following article assessment based how to write a conclusion of a book review an explicitly stated rationale, and a recommendation boko a potential audience.
Moreover, the student refers to an argument about feminist history in general that places the book in a specific genre and that reaches out to a general audience. The review offers criteria, opinions, and hoa with which the reader can agree or disagree. Developing visit web page assessment: before you write There is no definitive method to writing a review, although some critical thinking about the work at hand is necessary before you actually begin writing.
Thus, writing a review is a two-step process: developing an argument about the work under consideration, and making that argument as you write an organized and well-supported draft. What follows is a series of questions to focus your thinking as you dig into the work at hand. What is the thesis—or main argument—of the book?
If the author wanted you to get one idea from the book, what would it be? How does it compare or contrast to the world you know? What has the book accomplished? What exactly is the subject or topic of the book? Does the author cover the subject concluskon Does the author cover all aspects of the subject in a balanced fashion? How does the author support her argument? What evidence does she use to prove her point? Do you find that evidence convincing?
Why or why not? How does the author structure her argument? What are the parts that make up the whole? Does the writf make sense?
Does it persuade you? How has this book helped you understand the subject?
That interrupt review write conclusion to a a book how of has surprised
Would you recommend the book to your reader? What difference would it make if the author participated in the events she writes about? Out of what field does it emerge? Does it conform to or depart from the conventions of its genre? These questions can provide a historical or literary standard on which to base your evaluations.
If you are reviewing the first book wriet written on the subject, it will be important for your readers to know. Writing the review Once you have made your observations and assessments of the work under review, carefully survey your notes and attempt to unify your impressions into a statement that will describe the purpose or thesis of your review.
How to write a conclusion of a book review out our handout geview thesis statements. Then, outline the arguments that support your thesis. Your arguments should develop the thesis in a logical manner. The relative emphasis depends on the nature of the review: if readers may be more interested in the work itself, you how to write a conclusion of a book review want to make the work and the author more prominent; if you want the review to be about your perspective and opinions, then you may structure the review to privilege your observations over but never separate from those of the work under review.
What follows is just one of many ways to organize a review. Introduction Since most reviews are brief, many writers begin with a catchy quip or anecdote that succinctly delivers their argument. But you can introduce your review differently depending on the argument and audience. Link general, you should include: The name of the author and the book title and the main theme.
You could also link the title to the subject to show how the title explains the subject matter. Perhaps you want to situate a book about the Cuban revolution in the context of Cold War rivalries between the United States and the Soviet Union. Another reviewer might read article to consider the book in the framework of Latin American social movements.
Your choice of context informs your argument.
Of conclusion to book a review how write a
Your thesis about the book. The necessary visit web page of summary also depends on your audience. Graduate students, beware! If, on the other hand, your audience has already read the book—such as a class assignment on the same work—you may have more liberty drite explore more subtle points and to emphasize your own argument.
See our handout on summary for more tips. This arrangement can wrihe challenging when your purpose is to consider the book as a whole, but it can help you differentiate elements of your criticism and pair assertions with evidence more clearly. You do not necessarily need to work chronologically through the book as you discuss it. Given the argument you want to make, click at this page can organize your t more usefully by themes, methods, concluxion other xonclusion of the go here. If you find it useful to include comparisons to other books, keep them brief so that the book under review remains in the spotlight.
What exactly is the subject or topic of the book? Boston: The Writer, Does it conform to or depart from the conventions of its genre?
Avoid excessive quotation and give a specific page reference in parentheses when you do quote. Conclusion Sum up or restate your thesis or make the final judgment regarding the book. You should not introduce new evidence for your argument in the conclusion. You can, however, introduce new ideas that go beyond the book if they extend the logic of your own thesis.
Did the body of your review have three negative paragraphs and one favorable one? What do they all add up to? In review Finally, a few general considerations: Review the book in front of you, not the book you wish aa author had written. With any luck, the author of the book worked hard to find the right words to express her ideas. You should attempt to do the same.
Precise language allows you to control the tone of your review. Never hesitate to challenge an assumption, reveiw, or argument. Be sure, however, to cite specific examples to back up your assertions carefully. Try to present a balanced argument about the value of the book for its audience. But keep in mind that a bad book takes as long to write as a good one, and every author deserves fair treatment.