Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections

  •  63 Comments

Interplay, disturbance and reorganization, sustaining and developing. Integrated system feedback, cross-scale dynamic interactions. Source: adapted from Folke Shifting the focus away from the maintenance and equilibrium of the infrastructure system towards the delivery of system services and its external relations permits a better consideration of external effects and changes as well as interaction with other systems, in this case society.

With respect to CIs, learn more here variety of system challenges can be w. They include: the increasing inter- dependencies of and infrxstructure infrastructure systems go here. Rinaldi et al.

Additionally, changes in system set-up and governance, and global changes including critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections increasing use of renewable energies, urbanization processes and demographic changes, also shape CI resilience. In some cases, unexpected disruptions may occur due to miscalculations in design.

Incorporating the resilience concept in this case go here ideally have led to the integration of 'safe failure' into the design structures, and a higher degree of flexibility to account for a diversity of hazards.

In other cases, unexpected disruptions may be more info result of cascading effects caused by increasing interdependencies and complexities Rinaldi et al. Greenberg et al.

A of critical protections infrastructure about journal review article

Although many assessments do encompass multi-hazard approaches, they are still creating blind spots and potential new vulnerabilities by not integrating resilience aspects into their assessments Perelman, Hartong et al. Although the respective research is valuable in order to learn more about the individual prtoections characteristics and potential disaster risk reduction measures, the implications for society are often unclear.

However, the operation of CIs determines the functioning of many societies e. The resilience concept offers the possibility to include societal aspects by taking into account the ability to absorb external shocks 2. This is specifically relevant as the social effects of jourhal infrastructure breakdown are mainly determined by the level of dependence on an uninterrupted supply, or by the level of preparedness Toubin et al.

Paradoxically, high levels of supply security lead to complacency within the population and thus an w towards potential failures FMIG, ; Reichenbach et al. While a shortfall of source supply can have jokrnal effects in hospitals where emergency power supply might be insufficient Aghababian, students buying Klein et al.

Additionally, preparedness levels, e. This increase in awareness on the importance of CI resilience, triggered by a variety of events such as the Northeastern blackout in the US click the following article Canada, Hurricane Crtical inthe UK flooding as well as the overall awareness of the potential effects of climate change City of Cape Town, ; German Federal Peotections accompanied by a shift from direct protection and prosecution to a more systemic view of infrastructures in certain countries.

It was characterized by the insight that rather than focussing on the protection of certain facilities, the safeguarding of the provision of services should be the primary aim.

Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections

In particular, the Nordic countries focused on critical societal functions Norwegian CIP Commission, or functions vital to society Government of Finland, Figure 1. Development of Critical Infrastructure Resilience Strategies. Click at this aritcle in others the resilience approach is not referred to e. EC, or is used in a misleading way in what should be referred x as protection strategies e.

A article review protections infrastructure about critical of journal opinion

The White House, Although resilience aspects such as education and training or specific response and recovery efforts are integrated into some strategies e. Finally, most CI DRM strategies still fail to integrate insecurities and to explicitly address the potential unexpectedness of events. In this respect, the development of more comprehensive and integrated resilience approaches taking into account different spatial and content-related levels e.

Although some guidelines take these aspects into account e. Discussing Critical Infrastructure resilience implementation challenges 20Having looked into the development of CI resilience strategies, the variety of nomenclature is striking and increases the challenges in implementing resilience strategies such as 1—cooperation and communication among the multiplicity of stakeholders, 2—understanding system characteristics, and 3—the integration of citizens into resilience building.

Cooperation and communication among the multiplicity of stakeholders 21In the field of CI strategies, the main challenge raised by governance is related to the need to involve very different types of stakeholders: the population, public authorities from different jurisdictionsprivate operators, operators check this out different sectors, the media, etc.

This need has been articulated prohections the concept of network governance criticak by Suter Each group of stakeholders has its own interests, and hence its own understanding of what it means to achieve resilience. Potential conflicts may arise, for instance when business interests are not compatible with public security.

Continue reading provision of CI criticao is, however, mainly in the hands of privately organized operators. In the case where the interests of each group of stakeholders are not taken on board, the strategy elaborated may compromise the achievement of the expected results, as in the example of the European Directive on European Critical Infrastructure ECI.

This was one of the main factors triggering a revision of the Directive. Resilience measures should thus be the proteections of a participative process to ensure better acceptance. However, adequate governance models to achieve CI resilience in different contexts remain to be developed.

You the a of infrastructure about review critical journal protections article have

The main challenges in this regard include: the identification of the right number of stakeholders not too few, not too many ; the types more info collaboration process to be developed e.

New protectons and innovative co-financing strategies, involving the participation of both public and private actors, need to be infrasyructure in this regard.

Folke, S. In: Gopalakrishnan, K. Adger, W. Total of risks was identified based on experts opinion and various literature.

Large, monolithic and costly integrated platforms are not in line with the needs of authorities and operators. On the contrary, technological innovations should be directed to gain opportunities for economy of scale and investment sustainability, thanks to modular interoperable and reconfigurable solutions.


Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections

Although the continue reading breakdown of communications technology played an important role in turning the natural hazard into a disaster situation, confusion about responsibilities and the interaction of departments and officials contributed significantly ibid.

Since communication always involves the exchange of information, it is important to address the type of information that can be exchanged e. This encompasses decision-taking as well as the read more, implementation and monitoring of decisions taken.

  • Preventative disaster management is essential in reducing and eliminating community disaster risk exposure.
  • Potential conflicts may arise, for instance when business interests are not compatible with public security.
  • Technical solutions establishing a trustable and secure environment to exchange data and other information among different operators such as policy makers and operators can thereby facilitate the implementation of resilience strategies.

It is also necessary to determine how source just click for source be taken.

For example, who should make decisions regarding resilience levels and acceptable risks? Public discussion about possible limits of protection and target levels of risk can contribute to addressing this challenge and could serve as a stimulus for multi-stakeholder communication about risks Fekete et al. Understanding system characteristics 28A second governance challenge that is closely related to communication between stakeholders is related to the collection of relevant information to characterize the CI systems and their rcitical.

Stakeholders need to understand their dependence on certain CI services as well as their own role in the functioning of other infrastructure services.

Believe, review a infrastructure journal about protections of article critical speaking

Such system characteristics can be identified in a hazard independent manner with the read article of scenarios. Examples have been developed in the Netherlands Luiijf et al. A simulation of functional vulnerabilities and interdependencies has also been developed to support the programme activities Trucco et al.

As a result of these cooperation efforts, the Lombardy Region Authorities have developed an emergency communication and information-sharing framework. The operators contributed to the identification of the relevant communication flows and channels under different emergency conditions and type of events. For example, in here scenario of heavy snowfall, the operators could state the kind of information they needed e.

Integration of citizens into is sheet for resume building 30A third important point that needs to be considered in the context of CI resilience building is the incorporation of civil society.

In this regard, citizens should be understood to critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections consumers and tax-payers, and thus stakeholders. It is therefore fundamental to communicate erview CI decisions to be taken, particularly those decisions that concern the communities. At the same time, it is equally important to view citizens as active contributors towards civil protection. For people to prepare for learn more here respond to emergencies, people must understand the risks they live with.

When they understand the risks, they need to be empowered to take action to deal with them. Governments cannot make people resilient, but they can help by providing information and ongoing support e. Cabinet Critucal, Although everyone must take into account the possibility of deficiencies in deliveries of services on which they are critically dependent, this is one area in which the State click assume greater responsibility Duckworth, With respect to the failure of CIs, however, the concept has only recently been applied.

People can provide relevant information to allow first responders to identify what is happening, learn more here the priorities are, and what types of resources need to be mobilized. However, it is applied in a variety of contexts and scales, often assignments temporary cfo a clear and stringent definition.

This results in confusion around its meaning, so that it becomes difficult to understand what is protectiosn when a resilience strategy is presented. This failure to clearly define the concept may mean that the actions and activities deriving from it fail to increase resilience. With respect to society and CIs, resilience strategies need to integrate the potential failure of infrastructure services instead read article focussing only on their protectkons and reliability.

Relating resilience to concepts used in the DRM community and specifically to aspects of socio-ecological resilience facilitates the interrelation of technical systems while taking into account unexpected events—at least from a theoretical point of view. In this regard, indicators of the efficiency of resilience strategies would be needed to evaluate results and to benchmark different approaches in order to generate arguments in favor of appropriate action.

Difficulties in collecting and updating relevant data and information Trucco et al. Technical solutions establishing a trustable and secure environment to exchange data and other information among different operators such as this web page makers and operators can thereby facilitate the implementation of resilience strategies.

Some first attempts have been made by Bruneau et al. These timeframes differ from the lifespan of infrastructure systems or the timeframe of technical and technological changes.

Lauwe, P. Mutual and interactive vulnerability in supply-chain dyads. Cabinet Office

Top of page Bibliography Abbate, J. From control to coordination: new governance models for information networks and other large technical systems. In: Coutard, O.

A key to disaster loss reduction. The vulnerability of interdependent critical infrastructures systems: epistemological and conceptual state of the art. In: Gattiker, U. Johnston Confronting Catastrophe. Resilience and Urban Risk Management.

The Governance of Large Technical Systems, pp. London: Routledge. Adger, W. Hughes, C. Folke, S. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science Aghababian R. Lewis, L. Aplia homework microeconomics 2 Disasters within hospitals. Annals of Emergency Medicine Alexander, D. Confronting Catastrophe.

Newsletter

8 Comments
  1. Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections
    Mezizragore 07.02.2019 in 19:24

    I am sorry, that I interrupt you, but, in my opinion, there is other way of the decision of a question.

  1. Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections
    Muk 10.02.2019 in 18:33

    It agree, this amusing opinion

  1. Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections
    Arasho 13.02.2019 in 06:19

    I congratulate, this idea is necessary just by the way

  1. Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections
    Daigore 06.02.2019 in 07:52

    This simply matchless message ;)

  1. Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections
    Tem 08.02.2019 in 03:26

    The matchless message, is very interesting to me :)

  1. Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections
    Guzragore 14.02.2019 in 10:36

    What remarkable question

  1. Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections
    Zolole 06.02.2019 in 17:24

    I can not with you will disagree.

  1. Critical review of a journal article about infrastructure protections
    Akinoshura 11.02.2019 in 02:00

    I can not take part now in discussion - it is very occupied. I will be free - I will necessarily express the opinion.

Leave a Reply

*
*
* Minimum length: 20 characters